HARTFORD, Conn. – Former UConn basketball coach Kevin Ollie has filed litigation alleging that UConn has illegally tried to discourage Ollie from submitting a racial discrimination grievance.
Within the grievance, filed Tuesday in U.S. district courtroom, Ollie claims that he confronted “disparate therapy” from that of his predecessor, Jim Calhoun, who saved his job regardless of being discovered to have dedicated comparable recruiting violations to those that UConn cited when firing Ollie for trigger final spring.
Ollie claims that after he knowledgeable UConn of his intention to file a grievance, the college stated it might refuse to proceed with the contractual-grievance arbitration course of that can determine whether or not Ollie receives the cash that remained on his UConn contract when he was fired.
Per the grievance, Ollie had till Dec. 17 to file a grievance with the Connecticut Fee on Human Rights and Alternatives. He seeks emergency injunction reduction that may permit him to take action whereas nonetheless continuing with the arbitration course of.
In a press release despatched to The Courant on Tuesday, college spokesperson Stephanie Reitz contested Ollie’s suggestion that race performed a job in his firing.
“As UConn has said from the outset, the college terminated Kevin Ollie’s employment because of violations of NCAA guidelines, pursuant to his employment settlement,” Reitz stated. “Any declare on the contrary is with out advantage.”
Reitz didn’t handle the cost that UConn deterred Ollie from submitting the grievance with the CHRO.
Go to The Hartford Courant (Hartford, Conn.) at www.courant.com